Sunday, September 5, 2010
Ashburn, VA
64 ºF Low
Last update: 9/5/10 9:20 PM EDT

Greason Rebukes 1994 Charges

Rate this:
Average: 3.1 (19 votes)
Monday, 21 September 2009
 
 

...who continued, “When I was in the military, there was never any question regarding my conduct and I received the highest ranking possible as an officer even after this period.” 

Greason spoke to the Independent in response to charges made against him in Nov. 1996 by a female enlisted soldier who claimed that Greason had acted inappropriately in her presence while both were stationed at Fort Polk, La., in 1994.

Still affiliated with the military, she has asked that her name not be released in this account. At the time, she was acting as the driver for then-Lieutenant Greason. In a 1996 sworn statement, she claims that she drove him to oversee the construction of a helicopter pad. Attempting to catch some sleep while both were waiting in the vehicle, she claims to have awoken to find that Greason had exposed his genitals and appeared to be fondling himself.  At this point the driver said that she exited the vehicle, handed him some baby wipes and asked him not to soil the vehicle.

The driver told the Independent that she reported the incident to her master sergeant within a week of the incident at the insistence of her sister, although the 1996 statement indicates that it was reported through her sister. In either case, no formal investigation appears to have occurred until after the 1996 written statement was made and charges of obscenity and disturbing the peace were filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, which has jurisdiction over offenses at Fort Polk. Greason had already left the military by December 1996 when he was notified of the charges.

Tag Greason
Tag Greason
 “I found it weird that I was charged for something I didn’t do until 2 ½ years later,” said Greason, who added that he was shocked to hear of the charges and that records indicate he was not on a field exercise at the time.

Greason's military service was recalled by Col. Gene A. DeWulf (ret.), who said, "Tag Greason is one of the finest soldiers and officers with whom I have ever had the privilege of serving. He is a proven leader who cares deeply about America and has served her well."

DeWulf went on to say, "I am fully aware of the false charges brought against Lieutenant Greason. The federal court decision to dismiss the charges obviously exonerates Tag. But more importantly, his service record is exemplary and he continued that service in the Virginia National Guard. I was his commanding officer, and I have nothing but pride and admiration for Tag's character, integrity and service to his country."

The case itself took a circuitous route through the legal system, quickly dropped from a Class A offense and later being reduced to disturbing the peace. The case was then delayed multiple times in 1997 and 1998 before being “continued without date” in January 1999. The case was eventually dismissed in 2006 after an apparent lull in any active prosecution.

Greason's attorney, Charles King, believes that the delay speaks to the weakness of the case, saying, “The military has no tolerance for officers who behave inappropriately towards subordinates and the Justice Department doesn’t continue—and continue eight times—a criminal case where there is any credible evidence.”

“This is a textbook case of a specious claim,” King continued, “It’s made long after the fact, accused everyone of everything, and comes from someone with a grievance.”

In her 1996 statement, the driver does relate a series of incidents that occurred while stationed at Fort Polk—including harassment by the men of her platoon and two non-commissioned officers. She also related a hostile incident with the wife of a co-worker.

For her part, the driver has not wavered in her position that the event did occur and that Greason did act inappropriately in her presence, but she has not let it impact her life since her time at Fort Polk.

“It’s something in the past,” she reminded the reporter when questioned. “I don’t blame the military. It was the people involved,” she said.

However, speaking to the Independent, she expressed her concern for Greason and her hopes that an incident that occurred 15 years ago would not “hurt any good work that he’s doing now.”

A West Point graduate, Greason has indicated that he will continue his campaign for the House of Delegates.

“This was a false charge,” concluded Greason. “I’m happy to resume the campaign as we have, based on the issues.” Greason is currently engaged in a competitive race against incumbent Del. David Poisson. With future control of the House of Delegates in question, delegate races are certain to be hard-fought throughout the Commonwealth during this election cycle.

Republicans control the House by a relatively narrow margin; the 32nd District has been under close scrutiny by members of both state parties with Republicans hoping that a Greason win would either grant his party stronger control in the House of Delegates or blunt any Democratic gains elsewhere.

It remains to be seen how much impact this particular incident—a 15-year-old charge dismissed by the court—will have on the election results.

Dorry Samuels assisted in the research on this article. 

 


Terms for viewing user comments: Loudoun Independent does not endorse or control the content of posts submitted by others to various pages of Loudoun Independent websites. By using and/or submitting content to Loudoun Independent sites, you accept all responsibilities, agree to release Loudoun Independent, its parents and affiliates from any and all liability and obligations whatsoever in connection with or arising from your use of the sites, and further agree to the Terms of Use.

Comments

Anonymous (not verified)

Wow. This is damning for Greason. His candidacy is over.

jesse (not verified)

Wow!!! Good stuff, and goodbye Tag..

Anonymous (not verified)

No, good-bye Dave!!!

Susan Aaronson (not verified)

This story shows how even a good newspaper can be duped by Democrat-afflillated "opposition research" peddlers and scoundrels. This is a smear attempt plain and simple against a good man. Undoubtedly, this story was peddled to other newspapers who had better sense and superior gifts of journalistic discretion and chose not to run it. There are so many holes in the story presented by this unnamed witness who apparently waited years before filing her claim. One can only hope that this smear attempt will soon be replaced by news articles that deal with the real issues in the Poisson-Greason race.

Edward (not verified)

Susan, The case was brought up right away, and although the military may have waited years to prosecute the victim did not wait, she reported it right away. For those of you who think the military takes this very seriously and if something had happened the perpetrator would not have gotten away with it, then you are the one's who have been duped. The military has moved forward, but stuff like this still happens. There are no holes in this story, the victim's account has not changed over the many years it has been since this pervert did what he did. And the snake of a lawyer who categorizes the victim as someone whith a grievance is pure crap, read on down the story where the VICTIM, wanted this to be forgotten about if the PERPETRATOR was now doing good things. She has already moved past this incident. She was NOT the one to bring this forward again, she was contacted by the reporter doing the story to recount the details of what had happened. She did so without malice.
How do I know so much? I am her husband and have been with her since shortly after this incident. You can all say what you want, believe what you want, but this guy is a scumbag who doesn't have the testicular fortitude to admit his mistake, say he learned from it and move on. Shame on all you women who are jumping on the blame the victim bandwagon.

Anonymous (not verified)

Susan, this was a court case. Tag was charged with a crime for masturbating and then being handed a tissue to clean himself up. The Independent did use considerable discretion and wrote this story perhaps in the most positive light possible for Greason. But even with that we still have a woman who stands by her story that Tag began to masturbate in front of her while on duty in the military. Yuck.

Rachel (not verified)

It is admitted in the article that records indicate that she was someone with grievances against her former employer and that Tag was not even on a field operation when she claimed this occurred. In addition, the military takes these kinds of charges very, very seriously, and he would have been prosecuted in a timely manner if there was any merit at all to these charges. It is apparent that this was either a case of mistaken identity or something completely fabricated.

David DesRosier (not verified)

grievances againster her former employer? Please, 1st, the article mentions she is still in the Army, so no former employer there, 2nd, although the story may lump all of the instances together they were not related instances. 3rd, She never said it was on a field operation, as her driver she was told to drive him out to a field site to observe the construction of a helipad, so there is no way for him to prove he wasn't there, unless he can offer some proof he was somewhere else. 4th, if you really think that the military takes every charge like this seriously then you are either very naive or misinformed. The military still has major problems with sexual harassment and sexual assaults, so much so that they have coined a new phrase called Military Sexual Trauma, Military Hospitals and VA Hospitals now have to have MST teams to take care of the number of victims, and if you haven't read the DoD's own studies you should, it will shock you. While there are leaders who do take these charges seriously and deal with them appropriately, even the Army admits that this is not how all leaders deal with this. 5th, She was assigned as his driver for quite some time, long enough for her to know who he was and what he looked like. There was no mistaken identity. Now if you want to believe that this was a complete fabrication there will be nothing I could say to change your mind. I hope I clarified a few things.

The Gordon's Fisherman (not verified)

This story is way better documented than some other recent pieces. This relys on documents and legal proceeding as opposed to an anonymous blog entry with a history of posting discredited stories.

Anonymous (not verified)

This case was dismissed more than a decade ago, correct?. He wasn't convicted of anything.

Can we assume that this rag will now print every unsubstantiated accusation against every other candidate from now on?

Have any of you guys ever taken any journalism classes?

How about ethics 101?

Maravetz (not verified)

Just when there was great hope that this race was going to be about serious issues a trash piece hits. Can we possible get these two candidates to talk about transportation, education, safety, and taxes? I see no relevance to a 15 year old accusation that never went anywhere. The real story is who dug this up and thought it was relevant?
.
I want to judge the Poisson v Greason race on the issues. Please let's get back on target and get away from the nasty politics stuff. I thought this district saw the last of attack politics when we finally said good riddance to Dick Black. David and Tag both need to avoid this irrelevant trap and move onto the issues. Stand on the merits of your convictions and ideas, not some irrelevant diversion.

G.Stone (not verified)

Had this happened, he would have been found guilty. It did not and he was not. This is crap and the Poisson supporters pushing this know it. This is a political hit job based on a 15 year old charge that was dismissed. It was dismissed in part because the accuser appears to have been and probably still is living in another universe .
This type of thing may happen to someone once in a life time. However, this accuser has it happening all the time.
She is not believable and the court agreed. It did not happen and Tag was vindicated.

This is a perfect example of why people are so turned off by politics. This is the kind of crap that sickens most decent people.

I know Tag Greason. Tag Greason is a good man with a wonderful family and is committed to our communities. For his opponents to attempt to use this non sense against smacks of desperation.

Edward (not verified)

Hey G.Stone, get your story straight. What should sicken you is the way this good man with a wonderful family could act like that. The courts couldn't have found her beliavable, BECAUSE SHE WAS NEVER ASKED TO GO TO COURT TO TESTIFY! The slow wheels of Army justice took forever, the victim didn't even know this went to court until she was contacted by the reporter. Are you so naive to think that everyone who is guilty gets found guilty and convicted? Again, get your story straight, you don't know the victim yet you say she is living in another universe, is that what Tag told you about the victim? This guy is a sick SOB who deserves to have his career slammed. This kind of stuff sickens me too, get some balls Tag, admit what you did and move on. Be a man instead of a sexual predator.

Anonymous (not verified)

Since when is masturbating equated with being a sexual preditor? Its seems a bit ridiculous to take it that far. I don't know if the story is true or false. Either way I really think too much is being made of it. The story begins with "she was sleeping and woke to find Tag masturbating". If it is true it seems to me that he thought he had some quite time on his hands and it turned out otherwise. It doesn't seem like he intended to be caught.......if the story is true! Let's get to the issues that really count, for example schools. I would like to hear the candidates discuss how they plan to build enough schools to teach our children. This is the BIGGEST crisis we face right now. It affects our children and our pocketbooks.

Dave (not verified)

Yeah anonymous, I am sure your mom or your sister would agree with you that while she was sleeping in a vehicle in the driver's seat that the guy next to her had the right to jack off in the vehicle just cause she was sleeping. This is not just a case of someone who went to the bathroom to bust a nut and someone walked in on him. He was an officer in the United States Army who was sworn to protect this country and as an officer he was supposed to be protecting his soldiers and looking out for them, not jacking off in front of them. Ask a cop what you would get charged with if you were to just whip out your pecker and start masturbating in a bus with other people in it? You would be considered a sex offender. This is NOT about someone masturbating. IT IS ABOUT SOMEONE ACTING IN A DISTURBING MANNER. IF THIS IS THE KIND OF PERSON YOU WANT RUNNING YOUR SCHOOL SYSTEM THEN I AM DAMN GLAD I DON'T LIVE IN YOUR TOWN.

Anonymous (not verified)

Are you kidding me? Do you hear what you are saying? How dare you call somone a sexual predator! That is a pretty serious assumption to make about someone whom you don't even know. You have NO BASIS for using language like that. Read the story again - very carefully! Who deemed you the judge and jury? Last time I checked, in our country there is a saying...it is called innocent until proven guilty. Obviously you need to back off, read the facts, and realize that this case has no merit. I am sickened to think that by reading this you have the depth of knowledge to make such damaging assumptions.

Edward (not verified)

I don't have to read the story, I lived the story, so yeah, I have a basis for saying what I said and using the terms I used. So kiss my [explicitly deleted].

J. Dobson (not verified)

If Greg Stone is advocating for Tag Greason, that's it for me. I can't and won't be voting for Tag Greason.

I can past something that may or may not have not happeded in 1994, but if Stone is the kind of company Greason is kepping these days, I can't get past that.

Tom Seeman (not verified)

This is ridiculous. The charges were dropped because the prosecution didn't think there was a case. If there is no case, it's over. Anybody can make a claim about anyone. But for us to believe it there has to be credcible evidence, and there is none here, zilch, zippo, none. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Liberals love to tell us about what great civil libertarians they are... until a Republican is accused.

Loudoun voters are smart enough to know a spurious charge when they see one. This accusation will be rejected and Tag Greason will be elected in November.

Maravetz (not verified)

J. Dobson, I NEVER agree with Stone. Let me say that again, and Stoner will agree, I NEVER agree with him. Unbelievable, in this case, we do. Drop the political attack and let's get on with the issues. To call the man a sp without there ever being a court date is low, very low. Apparently it never got to court because there wasn't anything to go to court about.
.
Now that this firecracker has gotten everyone's attention can we PLEASE get on with the debate about issues that will effect all of us?

Henry Hale (not verified)

Interesting piece. Interesting for the fact that actual journalism was done to check facts and records. As has been seen in our country in regards to how women are treated in the military, this should not be dismissed out of hand. Yes, the slow wheels of justice ground to a halt, but it also is stated by a poster that the alleged victim was never involved in the prosecution's investigation and commitment to see justice served for all.

Some posters have stated that the woman had been known to make accusations, such as this, on a frequent basis. Where in the story was that fact reported? The reporting never gave any indication that this woman had accused people of this, or any, type of behavior in the past and was found to be making false allegations. Mr. Greason lawyer made mention of this, but the thing that puts the young lady in a good light is that she doesn't want this incident to affect any good deeds that Mr. Greason may be doing now. That is the heart of forgiveness that someone with credibility shows. It doesn't automatically make the story true for onlookers, but her actions surely leaves the reader with a good impression about her.

To the point that's been made that the military takes these things extremely serious, that is just not true. We have had many instances of bad behavior from men towards women in the military that have started to come to light over the last few decades. However, the fact has been made that women have had a tumultuous history with sexual indecencies while serving in the armed forces, so there is evidence to the contrary concerning the military's proactive nature concerning sexual harassment. More times than not, it has been looked at as "boys being boys" or "they were just letting off some steam". As a matter of fact, we've just had an embarrassing event in Afghanistan at our military installations. Although it was contractors, the de facto military these days, it was still a disgusting display of sexual deviance and immaturity.

That being said, Mr. Greason never had to account for his actions in a court of law, so it is correct to say that he was never found guilty. His innocence, in the legal sense, must be protected and respected, but, in the court of public opinion, he has taken a mighty blow to his character. Finally, to those who support Mr. Greason with the legal term "innocent until proven guilty", as you and he should, please remember those words when making statements about others. The hypocrisy of many, when it comes to "blind justice", can be overwhelming if the accused is not from a certain background or group.

Linda B (not verified)

"Some posters have stated that the woman had been known to make accusations, such as this, on a frequent basis. Where in the story was that fact reported?"
.
A little more than halfway down:
"In her 1996 statement, the driver does relate a series of incidents that occurred while stationed at Fort Polk—including harassment by the men of her platoon and two non-commissioned officers. She also related a hostile incident with the wife of a co-worker."
.
You're welcome.

J. Dobson (not verified)

Maravetz, I did not make a "political attack" as I said, the 1994 incident could very well be baseless, thus would not sway my vote for, or against Greason.

BUT, Greason keeping company with Stone, that's a problem.

Fact is we are judged by the company we keep, if Tag can't figure out who Stone is, that a problem. If he has figured it out and continues to keep company with him, that's a larger problem.

My decison is not about this 15 year old charge. It's about the here and now and Greason's poor judgement.

Maravetz (not verified)

J. Dobson, fair enough. I can relate to that.

AFF (not verified)

I agree with the previous poster. G Stone is toxic, and any "friend' of his probably isn't qualified to hold elected office in LoCo. I would have serious questions about any candidate who doesn't keep G Stone at arms length, and I can't understand how the LC GOP lets him on the bus, let alone near the steering wheel.

HisRoc (not verified)

"Greason Rebukes 1994 Charges"

Don't you mean that he "refutes" the charges?

Loudoun Insider (not verified)

This is so ridiculous! This kind of BS is going to drag me out of retirement.

Greason has women swooning over him all the time. To think that he would need to resort to this is simply not believable! This could be a case of a jilted ex or someone who had their advances rejected. Who knows - it was so long ago and there are no independent witnesses. Who knows if that is even her husband above - I would guess it's a Poisson operative trying to add credibility to this story.

This sounds like more Poisson dirty tricks, like the fake gay story from the last election. Poisson does seem to have learned something from Dick Black - how to smear one's political opponent, but Poisson seems to be much better at hiding his involvement. This surely was dredged up by the Dems' opposition research squad.

Henry Hale (not verified)

How is John Geddie part of the Poisson camp? That is a far stretch of the imagination. Come out of retirement? How about coming out of the closet behind some silly moniker, such as Loudoun Insider? If you're going to be upset with the story, be upset with the Independent, which we all know is the furthest from a progressive haven of thought and, with that, the furthest from being able to be used as a Democratic sounding block. It is more closer to the Fox "News" of Loudoun County, so there is credibility to the story and accusations. Mr. Greason wasn't ever bought before his accuser, so he is rightly "innocent before proven guilty", but you cannot dismiss this as a partisan attack. Not when the information has been fact checked. Like you said there has never been formal resolution for the alleged victim, so you cannot say for the certainty you display that it is fundamentally baseless. If I were a supporter of Greason, I would state my experiences with the man but not try to deduce the outcome of an issue that I was nowhere in the vicinity to give an objective viewpoint. Even the accuser says that she hopes that this situation doesn't completely negate any good he's done since then, so she has credibility in many of the posters' viewpoints. She just wanted to have her day in court but was denied that opportunity, because she wasn't aware that the case was being dragged on that long.

Anonymous (not verified)

John Geddie is a self described Democrat.

Not Loudoun Insider (not verified)

LI, your comment is a joke. So you think Greason is attractive therefore it excuses his decision to masturbate in front of a woman, WHILE ON DUTY NO LESS!

There are so many weird attempts to spin this story in this thread, but yours LI, it takes the cake.

Greason has women swooning all over him! HA! I'm sure that means they want him to whip it out and masturbate too right.

This guy is clearly twisted.

Edward (not verified)

Loudoun insider: You are an [explicitly deleted], you give me your contact information and i will call you and we can meet to discuss whether I am her husband or a political operative. Both myself and the victim are Republicans so don't go trying to push that political party bullshit either. Let's use your argument about swooning women, Mike Tyson is innocent of rape, Kobi Bryant is innocent...let's see, any more guys who have women swooning over them that didn't have to resort to that? There are a few people who know the truth, the victim and low life piece of shit you call Greason. Of course GOD knows too... so Tag, you can refute and rebuke all you want, but deep down you know how much of a piece of shit you really are. Why don't you sue for slander? Cause it's only slander if it aint true. THERE IS NO POLITICAL MOTIVATION OR OTHER HIDDEN AGENDA, SHE REPORTED THE INCIDENT WITHIN DAYS OF IT OCCURRING, SHE FORGOT ABOUT IT UNTIL JUST A FEW DAYS AGO. SHE WAS ASKED TO TELL HER STORY, SHE DID. SHE GETS NOTHING FROM THIS, SHE DIDN'T INITIATE THIS, SO YOU ALL CAN BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT. MY OPINION: VOTE FOR TAG, HE SEEMS TO HAVE ALL THE RIGHT DEVIANT QUALITIES TO MAKE A GOOD POLITICIAN ANYWAY, SO WHAT THE HELL, VOTE FOR HIM.

Anonymous (not verified)

Edward - you are absolutely right about that - LI is an [explicitly deleted]

Maravetz (not verified)

Stoner made the connection to TAG. TAG didn't make the connection with Stoner.

CSR (not verified)

This is ridiculous and the Democratic dirty tricks machine - either being run by Poisson or the DPV should be ashamed, they have sunk to a new low. No military court would allow this and the Army wouldn't have promoted Tag several more times if there was even a hint of truth to this. I hoped this would be a race where issues were debated and the people of the 32nd were put first and foremost, apparently the Democrats just want to hold this seat at all cost.

Anonymous (not verified)

The issues affecting Loudoun County are what is important to focus on during this election. It is unfortunate that journalists waste their time and talent on anything other than the issues when reporting on a political race. Mr. Geddie, this is not news. How the candidates will address our transportation, crime, and economic issues are what matters. Focus on the quality of your work, not the quantity.

Not Loudoun Insider (not verified)

Actually, considering Greason is running on his military record and family values, I have a hard time seeing how military documents that call into question his values are not newsworthy.

Henry Hale (not verified)

You have a very good comment. It appears that the "values candidates" are the ones who continuously have the sex scandals, and, if Mr. Greason is running on family values, then this is a legitimate issue to bring to the voters attention. As a matter of fact, this is something that needs addressing, because the same people who speak of wanting to hear about issues are the same ones, if it were you or me, that would be crucifying us on these threads. It really perplexing to see the right wing want to forgive and forget when one of theirs gets, once again, tied up in some sort of moral indiscretion. If a progressive, liberal, or Democrat gets caught with his/her hand in the cookie jar or, in this case, in his crotch, then that person is ruined as a politician and a person. Look how Bill Clinton continues to pop up every now and then. It would be good to want to speak on the issues, but, when your moral integrity is called into question by credible sources, that should be something the so-called "values voters" would want addressed with complete certainty. Can you say hypocrisy?

Anonymous (not verified)

Barney Frank, Gov. McGreevey, Eliot Spitzer, John Edwards, Bill Clinton, Sen. Kennedy on and on - Democrats have their share of sex scandals - take off the blinders...

Anonymous (not verified)

You are kidding, right?! There are no military documents that call into question his guilt. Please remember some history that took place prior to the alleged incident. In 1991 the Tailhook scandal broke. I was a contractor working at the Pentagon (and serving in the Marine Corps reserves) when this made the news. There were multiple training sessions for military and non-military personnel on sexual harrasment. It was made very clear that punishment would be swift and severe for those who broke the rules. With this alleged incident taking place less than 3 years after Tailhook, the military would have fried him if there was anything legitimate to the claims.

Loudoun Lady (not verified)

I doubt Edward has any relationship to the accuser, sorry - he is a plant.

Why won't the accuser come from behind her curtain and tell her story? I'll tell you why - because she is lying. I don't care that she is still in the military, have some honor and stand behind your accusations.

Please ask yourselves why this is coming out now? Is it because Tag is gaining on Poisson? Is it because Poisson comes from a class and school of political butchery via his training with Dick Durbin and his Chicago crew? Is it because he can't beat Tag on the issues so he has to resort to personal smears?

I have a message for those that support Poisson and are spreading these lies, your anonymity will probably be revealed and you will be exposed for the low-down, scum sucking political operatives that you are. That the Independent ran this story, in the format it is in, is absolutely sickening.

If keeping good men down is the only way Poisson can win, he is a little man indeed.

Disgusting.

Edward (not verified)

Loudoun "Lady";
Actually I am a man, not a plant, and you are certainly no lady. I'll give you the same option as the other idiot who claimed I was not her husband. Give me your info and I'll call you. If she is lying, why doesn't Tag take her to court? She doesn't need to come forward, this isn't her problem, it is Tag's. I got your message [explicitly deleted], bring it the [explicitly deleted] on. You really don't want to reveal the details, cause it would screw your candidate. You can make threats all damn day for all I care, cause when the shit hits the fan and the truth comes out, your guy Tag will be looking for another job, one that allows liars and deviants to work there...oh wait, maybe he will make a good politician.

Henry Hale (not verified)

Why is everyone pinning this on David Poisson? This is a story that the Loudoun Independent ran, and, given their corporate ownership and its political leanings, to say that this is, possibly, a Democratic plant is hallucination at best, stupidity in the extreme. If you're going to have a grievance about the story being reported, at lease use some intelligence to point the finger at the correct source.

Finally, I would be more than pleased if President Obama and Dick Durbin were friends of mine. These are two honorable men, who have lived their lives in respectable ways. Just because one may not advocate their policy positions, does that automatically make them dishonesty men? Both have had one wife, not three or been involved in any extra-marital affairs. Given your hidden words, you may look at some of the people you more, likely than not, support. What training has Mr. Poisson had from Dick Durbin; he's a state politician, not national. "Talking points" are not universal to every situation; you have to use some intellect to come up with "talking points" that fit the situation. Otherwise, you fall under the statement, "It's better to be silent and thought of as a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt".

Loudoun Lady (not verified)

AFF and friends, I love your complete hypocrisy when it comes to a candidates "friends" - Obama, Durbin and the Chicago machine to include Rahm and Rev Wright should be enough to scare the piss out of you, but you continue to support Poisson. He is a dirty politician, plain and simple - he can't win on the issues so he destroys a good man with the aid of a compliant press. Gee, where have seen this before?

Loudoun Insider (not verified)

Can you personally verify this allegation, Not LI??? I didn't think so.

Not Loudoun Insider (not verified)

LI, let me ask you this. If this absolutely didn't happen and the government didn't think they had a case, then why did they continue their prosecution all the way until 2006? Because they had nothing better to do?

Rachel (not verified)

As a military daughter, I'm personally offended when someone makes a comment that the military doesn't take charges like this seriously. They most certainly do, particularly when formal charges are brought. If there had been any case whatsoever, the military would have ensured that Tag was dishonorably discharged, not promoted. I've met Tag, and he has always treated me with the utmost respect, the same respect that my own father learned in the military. Please think before you say something so disparaging of all our our men and women in uniform.
More so than anything, I am an intelligent, informed, young voter. If anything, this attack makes me lean towards the Greason campaign.

J. Dobson (not verified)

Rachel,

I am also the child of the military. I believe that there is not higher honor then serving and one would be hard pressed to find more noble men or women then those who serve. It is hard and their families serve right along with them. Every person who serves deserves our respect.

Having said that I think if there is one place the military would admit they need to improve is how the handle this type of situations. Sometimes they can take a "boys will be boy’s attitude and actually blame the victim. I do believe that this type of attitude improved significantly after the "Tailhook" incident. But it does remain a problem.

I found that often how these things are handled depends on the CO (Commanding Officer). If they take the charge seriously from the start, AND MOST DO, it tends to be handled correctly. But we have to admit there are some CO's, VERY FEW, who would look the other way with a nod and a wink and “a let's not do it again attitude.”

We should not pretend that these types of situations never happen to women in the military because sadly they do.

I actually lean toward not believing this story.

I have met both Greason and Poisson, they both seem like good people and in that way I agree with Maravetz.

I hope they can get back to the issues.

G.Stone (not verified)

Given that AFF and Maravetz each have axes to grind and wounds to lick based on a multitude of previous conversations via the blogesphere, there comments should be taken with a pound of salt.

Anonymous (not verified)

Man caught polishing his gun - why is this a story? Circumstances and character of the accuser seem sketchy and this appears to be another Ben Rothliesberger type of situation. I guess Poisson is having a tough time talking about his record... Votes for the Driver Abuser Fees that were deemed unconstitutional (and this guys a lawyer?); Produced ZERO bills that passed this session (Did the guy find his office?); Campaigned for Government Run Healthcare with Judy Feder; on and on...I wonder what's in his past?

Maravetz (not verified)

I find it interesting that no other media source has picked up on this.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Loading...
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated.