Saturday, July 31, 2010
Ashburn, VA
64 ºF Low
Last update: 7/31/10 4:20 AM EDT

Opposition Again Raised to Western Schools

Rate this:
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
 

Wheatlands Protest- Sign
The course of school site selection never appears to be an easy one. Several local residents came out on April 29 to demonstrate their opposition to proposal that would build three new schools (1 high school, 1 middle, 1 elementary) on Route 287 between Lovettsville and Purcellville. The three schools would be constructed on the 170 acre plot.

The Wheatlands site would be purchased in two increments: a 160-acre plot, purchased for $9,925,000 and a 10-acre plot, purchased for $1,475,000. The price is one of the subjects of dispute between the School Board staff and opponents of the plan, each with different views on whether this is an appropriate price for the property in question. 

Echoing his concerns regarding the proposed school site purchase in southern Loudoun at Lenah Run, Supervisor Jim Burton (I-Blue Ridge) is quoted as saying that the price “cannot be justified in the current market.”

Burton generated a list of other possible sites for school construction in the west, but a memo from Lewis Rauch of the Office of Capital Construction, states that the list is “limited in comparable parcels of this size, geotechnical features, and transportation infrastructure availability.” Rauch also states his belief that given the acreage and development rights belonging to the seller, $64,000 per acre is reasonable.

Several of those opposed to the site have formed the Wheatland Alliance, largely composed of residents and farmers along Route 287, the connecting road between Purcellville and Lovettsville.

According to Catoctin’s representative on the school board, Jennifer Bergel, the primary issues at last week’s public hearing were price, location, water supply and size.

Size and location are certainly primary to many of those opposed to the project. Particularly those who believe that large multi-school or “eduplex” campuses are inappropriate for the area given the centralization of traffic and the impact to the scenic aspect of the area.

“Schools are meant to be near the students they serve, not on the easiest site found, far away from public utilities,” said Ellen Polishuk, owner of Potomac Vegetable Farms and one of the organizers of Wheatland Alliance. The close proximity of the three schools is a positive factor for the School Board as the co-location allows for efficiencies in transporting students and providing for utilities.

Wheatlands Protest- American Gothic
Sam Adamo and Dr. Hatrick shown in "American Gothic" style by opponents of the Eduplex.

The projected opening date for the elementary school is 2016, 2017 for the middle school and 2018 for the high school pending a series of inspections for suitability and final approval by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors.

Unlike Loudoun County’s long debate with the Town of Purcellville over a school within their town limits, the eduplex proposal does have the support of several elected representatives from Lovettsville. In a March 25 letter to School Board Chairman Robert DuPree (Dulles), Lovettsville Mayor Elaine Walker explained that the Town Council had voted unanimously to support the decision.

Opponents of the proposed school site met in front of the Loudoun Government Center on Monday, May 4 for a rally to demonstrate their opposition to the proposed plan. Opponents of the plan also presented the Board of Supervisors with a petition calling for the Board of Supervisors to stop the purchase.

wheatlands Protest- Public Hearing
Protestors at the BOS Public Hearing

 


Terms for viewing user comments: Loudoun Independent does not endorse or control the content of posts submitted by others to various pages of Loudoun Independent websites. By using and/or submitting content to Loudoun Independent sites, you accept all responsibilities, agree to release Loudoun Independent, its parents and affiliates from any and all liability and obligations whatsoever in connection with or arising from your use of the sites, and further agree to the Terms of Use.

Comments

Mad-As-Hell (not verified)

This is a terriable contract for the purchase of a school site. The way it is constructed, the school board will close on the deal in July, way before all the studies are done and before any special exception hearing is ever held. Therefore, if the school is not allowed, the county will still own 170 acres of farmland that they paid over $67,000 an acre for. Not a chance in hell they will be able to unload it at that price. Does this sound like good planning to you?

This deal stinks and the BOS needs to stop it now before it is too late.

Dan_S (not verified)

To get an idea of what an incredible rip-off this is, take a look at these two comparable properties, both in the area, and both on the list of sites considered by LCPS:

MLS# LO7027260 - 193.8 acres, preliminary subdivision for 38 lots $3.4 million = 17,500 / acre

MLS# LO7026145 - 146 acres, not subdivided $1.2 million = 8,200 / acre

vs. What Loudoun Taxpayers will be buying:

Cangiano/Burgess - 170 acres, preliminary subdivision for 35 lots $11.4 million = 67,000 / acre

Anonymous (not verified)

"**Several** local residents came out on April 29th???" Please, the Lovettsville Elem cafeteria was packed and an overwhelming majority of the the people who spoke were opposed to the Wheatland site for the proposed "eduplex".

kk (not verified)

The ENORMOUS issues of price, location, water supply and size are significantly underplayed in this article and in many discussions surrounding the school site selection controversy. These four descriptors do not adequately convey the detriment to the county and its residents if the BOS pushes (railroads?) this deal through. Buried under the vague reference to "price" are 1) seriously over-valued price per acre, as evidenced by the pricing structures of nearby comparables. No homeowner could get away with this when seeking to buy or sell property. This leads to 2) the burden of this (smelly) deal on Loudoun taxpayers -- ALL taxpayers, not just those in Wheatland. "Location" does not begin to describe the disservice this site selection does to residents of Lovettsville, who want and need the schools, nor does it address the issues associated with busing students to locations outside of their communities when we now have an opportunity to positively impact this situation. "Water supply" glosses over the impact of the mega-plex water draw on area farms and residences, many of which may require new wells at significant cost, or the impact of the alternative septic systems that will be required, potentially opening a floodgate of development currently held at bay by inability to produce viable perc sites. Nor does it even hint at the propensity of the area for flash flooding, which certainly will be exacerbated by the acres and acres of impermeable surface required for parking lots and the buildings themselves. And finally, "size" fails to adequately convey the impact of the traffic, noise and damage to the environment that will necessarily accompany the co-location of 4,000+ students, hundreds of teachers and staff, dozens of buses and hundreds of other vehicles all directed into one area, all at the same time twice a day, where little transportation infrastructure exists to support it. And I haven't even mentioned one more point: There is a world of difference between 8-year-olds and 16-year-olds. The former are impressionable; some of the latter (with no disrespect to 16-year-olds in general) are bound to constitute a negative influence. The former often are not as vigilant as their older counterparts; many of the latter are driving. Elementary school parents: why aren't you scared to death, mad as hell, or both?

anonymous (not verified)

KK, I assure you elementary school moms are mad as hell about this. Unfortunately we have had our hands full with the Western Loudoun boundary issue until last week. Hatrick/Adamo succeeded in basically emptying all the small western Loudoun schools in order to fill the new Culbert Elementary, which was supposedly needed to house all the new students from developments. It was so necessary that it was slated to open only 1/3 full. OOPS! Where to get the students so it didn't seem unneeded and anger the taxpayers? Just take them from the small rural schools. That way Hatrick/Adamo could kill two birds with one stone: make the new Culbert school appear needed, and make the older neighborhood schools look empty and unnecessary. As a result, we can expect in the future to hear school board members calling for the closure of neighborhood schools like Hamilton and Lovettsville. Through elementary attendance boundary changes Adamo has also successfully stacked the deck to make his case for building the mega-school complex at Wheatlands by leaving Round Hill and Lovettsville elementaries to become overcrowded in the next two years, so that he can claim the new Wheatlands site is necessary in order to relieve the overcrowding. Of course that overcrowding could have been relieved by sending the Round Hill and Lovettsville students to Culbert and leaving the small rural schools alone. That's how they do the job at LCPS planning! And by the way that's what all of us elementary moms spend our time doing - fighting off attacks from our own highly paid LCPS Superintendent.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Loading...
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated.