Response to Anonymous' 7-10-09 - re JtComm's public hearing: "That's hardly an official or a quality vetting process. "
So what is the official vetting process? Last fall county and school staff jointly prepared a recommendation, members of both boards jointly agreed to try it out, they used it and even received public input on it and presumably are reworking it now. It's not a law, it's a process = so what more would you suggest needs to happen to be officially vetted? Another public hearing and vote by both full Boards? Should all school planning abruptly halt until an officially vetted process is final? and should Loudouners insist that be done immediately?
%7Cutmcsr%3D(direct)%7Cutmcmd%3D(none)%3B%2B__utmv%3D89599118.-%3B)
Response to Anonymous' 7-10-09 - re JtComm's public hearing: "That's hardly an official or a quality vetting process. "
So what is the official vetting process? Last fall county and school staff jointly prepared a recommendation, members of both boards jointly agreed to try it out, they used it and even received public input on it and presumably are reworking it now. It's not a law, it's a process = so what more would you suggest needs to happen to be officially vetted? Another public hearing and vote by both full Boards? Should all school planning abruptly halt until an officially vetted process is final? and should Loudouners insist that be done immediately?